Under the Empire, things would get only slightly better for most Romans, who were tired of bloody civil wars. Augustus, the first emperor, consolidated his stranglehold on political and military power and claimed that he had restored the Republic. In reality, he was just the first in a long line of emperors that lasted until at least 476 CE. These emperors were in fact monarchs who relied on military power, moral authority, or perceived divine will to make their control of the known world legitimate. Whether or not Augustus and his successors were good emperors, their rule was absolute.
History Continues to Unfold
Until fairly recently, much of the story of the Etruscan monarchy and the early Roman Republic supplied by the ancient historian Livy was more or less accepted as fact, or at least as a useful model given that there was no other. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that Livy's account is a less than reliable discussion of early Rome. There are no written records of any sort from earlier than the third century BC, and even the date of the founding of Rome - 753 BCE - is a product of the first-century BCE. Archaeology is the most important key to understanding the remote past, and it is now clear that Roman society is much older and more complex than Livy led us to believe. A current trend in scholarship is to concentrate less on wars and alliances and more on social history, on how the ancient Roman people lived.
Writing: ECHOES from the past published by McGraw-Hill Ryderson Ltd.
No comments:
Post a Comment